International SMM

Indie Hackers

RegionUSA and Canada

Platform · this deep dive is built from the official pages of the platform itself and of the tools that support it.

Overview

Indie Hackers is a forum for founders of small internet projects, where it is customary to publish not only stories but revenue. The platform describes itself like this: «Connect with developers sharing the strategies and revenue numbers behind their companies and side projects» — that is its own wording in the home page markup.

The structure is a feed of posts with votes and comments, topic groups, a product directory, an ideas database, a job board and offline meetups. A separate showcase is "The Build Board", which the platform describes as «A daily leaderboard of build-in-public posts», that is, a daily ranking of posts by people building a product in the open.

The audience here is practitioners, and that sets the tone. A corporate launch announcement sinks; what works is a breakdown with numbers: what it cost, what did not work, what the revenue is now. You can see this on the home page from the headlines in the "Featured" selection — stories with specific income figures.

The owning company is given in the site footer: «© Indie Hackers, Inc.».

Who's here

The only measurable claim on the site itself is in a newsletter issue: an invitation to share material with «nearly 120,000 indie hackers». This is the platform's statement about the size of its newsletter, not about the number of registered users, and it refers to the date of that issue.

The interface language is English: the home page markup specifies lang="en-US" (indiehackers.com).

The geography of activity is visible indirectly: the platform has a meetups section and a "Looking to partner up" group for finding co-founders (the home page).

Ownership and history are described in a post by the platform itself: exactly six years after Stripe bought Indie Hackers, founders Courtland and Channing Allen announced that they were again running the project as an independent, founder-owned business, with Stripe remaining an investor. In the same post the founder says outright that from here on the project will have to earn its own way.

Getting started

Registration is ordinary, through a form or an external sign-in; there are no document checks. After that you enter an environment where actions gradually unlock as you accumulate points.

There are no exact rules in the form of a document on the site, but the application configuration that the site serves right in the source of the home page contains parameters with telling names: minPointsForLinkPosts — 20, minPointsForDownvoting — 20, minPointsForBioLinks — 50, minPointsForFollowedLinks — 500. It appears that posting links, downvoting and links in a profile bio unlock at point thresholds, and that links stop being "nofollow" only after a substantial threshold. There is no official explanation of these values, so treat them as an indication of how the platform is built rather than a documented rule.

The practical conclusion is the same as on other community platforms: first take part in other people's discussions, then publish your own posts with links.

What you can publish

The formats visible on the platform itself: posts in the feed and in groups, product cards with updates, ideas in a separate database, job listings, and meetups (the home page, the groups section).

The length and size limits set in the application configuration on the home page: a post headline — up to 140 characters, the body — up to 100,000 characters, no more than 5 images per post, image size — up to 5,000,000 bytes (about 5 MB), the description — up to 155 characters; a comment — up to 12,000 characters; a group name — up to 25 characters, and a single group rule — up to 80 characters; a username — up to 20 characters, changeable no more than once every 90 days. The source of these numbers is the site's own configuration, not a published rules document.

The rules about what you cannot publish are set at group level. The platform's founder described this mechanism in a post about a product change: a group owner can set up to five posting rules, and they are shown to everyone who is about to write something in the group — «you literally have to scroll past them to create your post». The post is dated 14 September 2020. In other words, the platform has no single list of prohibitions — there are the rules of a specific group, and you need to read them before posting.

How to grow

How ranking works is visible only indirectly — in the configuration on the home page: the parameter topFeed.sortingCutoffInHours equals 36, and the feed recalculation periods are set in milliseconds — 5,400,000 (an hour and a half) on weekdays and 7,200,000 (two hours) at weekends. It appears that the "top" feed is reassembled regularly and takes into account posts of limited freshness.

What is described explicitly is how groups work. The groups page lists the ways into the selections: «Fastest Growing» — groups whose member count grew by the largest percentage over the past week; «Most Popular» — groups with the largest number of people writing posts and comments over the week; recently launched, inactive and suggested groups are shown separately. The lists, as stated on the same page, are updated daily at midnight Pacific time.

The second channel is "The Build Board", the daily ranking of posts about building a product in the open (the home page). The third is the newsletter: the home page has both a subscription form and an invitation to send material for a future issue.

Advertising is sold on the platform: the home page has an "Advertise on Indie Hackers" link (the home page).

Path to monetization

Indie Hackers does not pay authors: there is no share of advertising revenue, no payments for posts and no built-in donations. The money flows the other way — from the reader to the platform.

The paid subscription is called IH+. Its prices are set in the application configuration on the home page: monthly — $24.75 per month ($297 per year), and with annual payment — $16.50 per month ($198 per year). The same place has the limits for those who do not pay: 5 posts and 2 idea reports. This is also visible to the eye on the home page: some material is marked "IH+ Subscribers Only".

Credits for the ideas database are sold separately: packs of 75 credits for $16, 225 for $39, 600 for $78 and 1500 for $162; an IH+ subscriber is promised 225 free credits and a 15% discount on purchases (the configuration on the home page).

For you as an author, monetization here is indirect: the platform is a source of customers and feedback for your product, not a source of payouts.

Tools and automation

Indie Hackers has no official public API: there is no developer documentation section and no description of endpoints on the public pages. From the source of the home page you can see that the application is built on Ember and runs on top of Firebase and cloud functions, with search served by Algolia — but that is the site's internal architecture, not an invitation to integrate.

The practical conclusion: work with the platform is manual. No automation beyond your own publishing calendar is envisaged here, and bulk automated activity in a community of this size is noticed immediately.

Limits and rules

Who it's for

It suits founders of small products who are willing to show numbers: what is valued here is a breakdown with revenue, mistakes and details, not an announcement. It suits those running a project in the open — there is a dedicated showcase, "The Build Board", and topic groups for that (the home page, groups).

It suits looking for a co-founder and first users: there is a partnership group, meetups and a job board.

It does not suit large companies with a corporate tone: the audience is built around solo founders and small teams. It does not suit projects that need payouts from the platform — there are none. And it does not suit those counting on automation: there is no programming interface, and everything is done by hand.

Verified data

The checked data this deep dive rests on.

About the platform

the platform describes itself as follows: «Connect with developers sharing the strategies and revenue numbers behind their companies and side projects.»

Matches the database record; taken from the meta description and og:description

source, checked 2026-07-28

the platform describes itself as follows: «Connect with developers sharing the strategies and revenue numbers behind their companies and side projects.»

Matches the database record; taken from the meta description and og:description

source, checked 2026-07-28

the platform reports that exactly six years after Stripe bought Indie Hackers, founders Courtland and Channing Allen announced that they were again running the project as an independent, founder-owned business, with Stripe remaining an investor

The owner is given in the site footer as «© Indie Hackers, Inc.». The date of the post itself was not read from the page

source, checked 2026-07-28

Who's here

in a newsletter issue the platform writes of «nearly 120,000 indie hackers» when inviting people to send material

This is the size of the newsletter on the date of that issue, not the number of registered users; the platform does not publish the registered figure

source, checked 2026-07-28

What you can publish

the platform's sections: a feed of posts, topic groups, a product directory with updates, an ideas database, a job board, meetups, «The Build Board» — «A daily leaderboard of build-in-public posts», a newsletter, and the paid IH+ subscription

source, checked 2026-07-28

Promotion

the group selections: «Fastest Growing» — groups with the largest percentage growth in members over the week; «Most Popular» — groups with the largest number of people writing posts and comments over the week; recently launched, inactive and suggested groups are shown separately; the lists are updated daily at midnight Pacific time

source, checked 2026-07-28

in the application configuration: topFeed.sortingCutoffInHours — 36; the feed recalculation periods are 5,400,000 ms on weekdays and 7,200,000 ms at weekends

The platform does not publicly describe how ranking works; this is an observation from the configuration, not a claim by the platform

source, checked 2026-07-28

in the application configuration: the IH+ subscription is $24.75 per month when paid monthly ($297 per year) and $16.50 per month when paid annually ($198 per year); a subscriber is promised 225 free credits and a 15% discount on credit purchases; without a subscription you get 5 posts and 2 idea reports

The formatted /plus pricing page is empty without a browser; discrepancies with what the user sees are possible

source, checked 2026-07-28

Pricing

in the application configuration: credit packs for the ideas database — 75 credits for $16, 225 for $39, 600 for $78, 1500 for $162; a new board is credited with 18 starter credits

The source is the application configuration in the page markup

source, checked 2026-07-28

Limits and restrictions

in the application configuration served in the home page source: a post headline — up to 140 characters, the body — up to 100,000 characters, up to 5 images, an image — up to 5,000,000 bytes, the description — up to 155 characters; a comment — up to 12,000 characters; a group name — up to 25 characters, a single group rule — up to 80 characters; a username — up to 20 characters, changeable no more than once every 90 days

The source is the application configuration in the page markup, not a published rules document

source, checked 2026-07-28

in the same configuration: minPointsForLinkPosts — 20, minPointsForDownvoting — 20, minPointsForBioLinks — 50, minPointsForFollowedLinks — 500

The parameter names point to point thresholds for posting links, downvoting and links in a profile, but we found no official explanation of them on the site

source, checked 2026-07-28

Restrictions

the rules are set at group level: an owner can set up to five posting rules, and they are shown to everyone before a post is created — «you literally have to scroll past them to create your post» · the source is dated 2020-09-14

A post by the platform's founder dated 14 September 2020. We found no single public body of prohibitions on the site

source, checked 2026-07-28

Languages

Sources diverge: the home page markup specifies lang="en-US"

source, checked 2026-07-28

Catalogue section: all similar See also: catalogue index · region: USA and Canada · scheduler comparison · find by situation · platform restrictions